Benefits of bi-antibiotherapy in the treatment of neonatal bacterial infection in a secondary care hospital in a resource-limited setting

Authors

  • Calixte Ida Penda Author
  • Daniele Mangamba Kedy Koum Author
  • Paul Olivier Koki Ndombo Author
  • Gorgie Monny Elimbi Author
  • Juste Patient Mbebi-Enone Author
  • Enyama Dominique Author
  • Hassanatou Iyawa Ousmanou Author
  • Patricia Epee Eboumbou Author
  • Grace Dallé Ngondi Author
  • Charlotte Eposse Ekoube Author
  • Sena Muna Penda Author
  • Clotilde Njall Pouth Author
  • Julien Mang Mani Author
  • Ritha Mbono Betoko Author
  • Cécile Okala Ebongue Author

Keywords:

Therapeutic recommendations, Neonatal sepsis, Newborns, Cameroon

Abstract

Introduction. Neonatal sepsis remains a major cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality in resource-limited settings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of two antibiotics compared to the current triple therapy used in the neonatology department of the Douala Laquintinie Hospital (DHL). Methodology. A cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1 to March 31, 2020, in the neonatology department of DHL. We included full-term or preterm babies with gestational age ≥ 34th weeks with anamnestic and/or clinical criteria for neonatal sepsis. Newborns were divided into 3 groups according to the treatment and severity criteria: Protocol 1 (Ampicillin/Gentamycin); Protocol 2 (Cefotaxime/Gentamycin) according to the High Authority for Health (HAS) and Protocol 3 (Cefotaxime/Ampicillin/Tobramycin) respectively in this unit. The length of stay, clinical outcomes and kinetics of C-reactive protein were evaluated in each group. Results. Of 320 neonates admitted for neonatal sepsis, those aged 0-7 days accounted for 94.1% of cases. Newborns under Protocol 2 had a longer length of stay than those who received Protocol 3 (p=0.015) and more children were significantly cured in Protocol 2 than in Protocol 3 (p=0.022). More than half of the newborns (n= 130) with an initial positivity of the CRP obtained a negative CRP after 72 h of treatment regardless of the protocol used. Conclusion. Dual therapy, a therapeutic recommendation of the High Authority of Health has positive results on clinical and biological recovery but with a longer length stay for newborns with gestational age higher than 34 weeks.

References

Popescu CR, Cavanagh MM, Tembo B, Chiume M, Lufesi N, Goldfarb DM et al. Neonatal sepsis in low-income countries: epidemiology, diagnosis and prevention. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2020; 18:443–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14787210.2020.1732818.

UNICEF. Levels and trends in child mortality 20 19 2019. https://www.unicef.org/reports/levels-and-trends-child-mortality-report-2019 (accessed August 20, 2022).

Vergnano S, Menson E, Kennea N, Embleton N, Russel AB, Watts T et al. Neonatal infections in England: The NeonIN surveillance network. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96(1): F9–14. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2009.178798.

Fleischmann C, Reichert F, Cassini A, Horner R, Harder T, Markwart R et al. Global incidence and mortality of neonatal sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child. 2021; 106(8):745-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2020-320217.

Weston EJ, Pondo T, Lewis MM, Martell-Cleary P, Morin C, Jewell B et al. The Burden of Invasive Early-Onset Neonatal Sepsis in the United States, 2005–2008. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011; 30(11): 937–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e318223bad2.

Braye K, Foureur M, de Waal K, Jones M, Putt E, Ferguson J. Epidemiology of neonatal early-onset sepsis in a geographically diverse Australian health district 2006-2016. PloS One. 2019; 14(4): e0214298. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214298.

Jajoo M, Kapoor K, Garg LK, Manchanda V, Mittal SK. To study the incidence and risk factors of early onset neonatal sepsis in an out born neonatal intensive care unit of India. J Clin Neonatol. 2015; 4(2): 91-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/2249-4847.154106.

Chiabi A, Djoupomb M, Mah E, Nguefack S, Mbuagbaw L, Zafack J et al. The Clinical and Bacteriogical Spectrum of Neonatal Sepsis in a Tertiary Hospital in Yaounde, Cameroon. Iran J Pediatr. 2011; 21(4): 441–8.

Koum DCK, Essomba NE, Ngaba GP, Sintat S, Ndombo PK, Coppieters Y. Morbidity and risk factors for neonatal mortality in Douala Referral Hospital. Pan Afr Med J. 2015; 20: 258. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2015.20.258.5648. (French article)

Kemeze S, Moudze B, Chiabi A, Eposse C, Kaya A, Mbangue M et al. Clinical and bacteriological profile of neonatal bacterial infection at Laquintinie Hospital, Douala (Cameroon). Pan Afr Med J. 2016; 23:97. https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.23.97.8523. (French article)

Label de l’HAS - Prise en charge du nouveau-né à risque d’infection néonatale bactérienne précoce (≥ 34 SA). Haute Autorité Santé. https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_2803349/fr/label-de-la-has-prise-en-charge-du-nouveau-ne-a-risque-d-infection-neonatale-bacterienne-precoce-34-sa.

(Accessed August 20, 2022)(French).

Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. 3rd edition. New York (NY). John Wiley and Sons; 1977.

Noukeu ND, Enyama D, Ntsoli KG, Djike PY, Mbakop TC, Bissa MC et al. Determinants of Neonatal Mortality in a Neonatology Unit in a Referral Hospital in Douala, Cameroon. Health Sci Dis. 2021; 22(10): 27-34.

Konaté D, Coulibaly O, Sidibe LN, Diallo OH, Diall H, Diakité FL et al. Early neonatal bacterial infection in 2016 at the University Hospital Gabriel Toure, Bamako. Rev Malienne Infect Microbiol. 2019; 14: 62–7.

Annamalai A, Gupta V, Jain S, Datta P. Increasing Resistance to Reserve Antibiotics: The Experience of a Tertiary Level Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. J Trop Pediatr. 2021; 67(1) : fmaa086. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmaa086.

Penda CI, Betoko RM, Koum DK, Essome H, Eboumbou PE, Edimo CM et al. Etiologies of Neonatal Mortality in a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Resource-Limited Setting. Open J Pediatr. 2021; 11: 268–80.

Petel D, Winters N, Gore GC, Papenburg J, Beltempo M, Lacroix J et al. Use of C-reactive protein to tailor antibiotic use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(12): e022133. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022133.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-02

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

How to Cite

[1]
Calixte Ida Penda et al. 2024. Benefits of bi-antibiotherapy in the treatment of neonatal bacterial infection in a secondary care hospital in a resource-limited setting. The African Journal of Perinatology. 1, 2 (Sep. 2024), 101–115.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.